Learner
Outcomes Home > Snapshot
> Measures
The
college's expectations for students in communication, problem solving/critical
thinking, ethics, environmental awareness, and international/multicultural
awareness are clearly reiterated in the FSHN department's learning outcomes
for all majors. The following table shows how college and department
outcomes correlate in each area.
| Area |
College Outcomes |
FSHN Outcomes |
| Communication |
- Be able to speak and write clearly
and persuasively
- Demonstrate the skills necessary
to prepare effective visual presentations
- Be able to receive information
effectively through reading, listening and observation
|
C.1.
Communicate effectively with others in one-on-one, small group,
and large-group situations.
C.2. Prepare and deliver effective presentations (orally
and in writing) of technical information to food science and nutrition
professionals.
C.3. Prepare and deliver effective presentations (orally
and in writing) of technical information to the general public. |
| Problem -Solving/Critical
Thinking |
- Be able to work effectively with
others on complex, issue-laden problems requiring holistic problem-solving
approaches
- Demonstrate an ability to:
- distinguish verifiable facts
from value claims
- determine the accuracy of
statements
- identify assumptions and detect
bias
- distinguish relevant from
irrelevant information
- prioritize needs
- Be able to summarize, analyze,
and interpret simple research data.
|
P.1.
Successfully solve multidisciplinary problems as part of a team.
P.2. Successfully solve complex problems on your own.
P.3. Locate and accurately interpret current research
literature.
P.4. Summarize and accurately interpret data generated
by yourself and others.
P.5. Critically evaluate information on food science
and nutrition issues appearing in the popular press. This
includes distinguishing facts from claims, detecting bias, identifying
sources of conflict, and evaluating assumptions. |
| Ethics, Environmental
Awareness, International/Multicultural Awareness |
- Develop an ethical perspective
and sense of moral responsibility and values
- Be able to discuss contemporary
ethical and moral issues in professional and private life
- Be able to critically evaluate
their own arguments and those of others
- Understand the physical and biological
properties of the environment and how these properties are interlinked
within ecological systems
- Understand how human activities,
such as modern agricultural practices, impact on the environment
and how societies are affected by environmental change
- Have an awareness and understanding
of cultural diversity within our own nation and around the world
- Develop a global perspective on
agricultural, environmental, economic, and natural resource
issues
|
S. 1.
Conscientiously apply your profession's code of ethics
in your work
S. 2. Discuss the social, multicultural, and environmental
dimensions of issues facing professionals in your field. |
How goals are
measured
After the departmental goals were defined and agreed upon by the FSHN
faculty, the FSHN curriculum committee polled all faculty regarding
which outcomes were addressed in each FSHN course, how much emphasis
was placed on these outcomes, and how student achievement of these outcomes
was measured. See Direct and Indirect
Measures section for more information. A curriculum
map was developed for each undergraduate major in FSHN, which showed
the degree to which each departmental goal was addressed in the courses
required of that major.
Assessment
of student performance in FSHN courses and in achieving departmental
goals is made both directly and indirectly.
Direct measures
All food
science majors take a capstone course, FSHN 412 Food Product Development,
in which they demonstrate their ability to lead and cooperate in teams,
apply their knowledge of all aspects of food science in the development
and scale-up of a new product, and effectively summarize their results
in written, oral, and poster presentations. Their efforts are evaluated
by course instructors, other faculty members, and an external board
of directors composed of food industry representatives.
While there
is no single capstone course for dietetics and nutritional science majors,
the four courses taken by seniors in these curricula (FSHN 461, 463,
464, and 466) require students to demonstrate their technical knowledge
and their ability to solve problems and communicate information in clinical
and community nutrition and nutrition education and counseling. Instructors
of these courses evaluate student performance.
Methods
of measuring student achievement include:
- personal
observation by the instructor in the classroom and laboratory
- instructor
and peer evaluation of individual and group oral presentations
- instructor
evaluation of written reports
- evaluation
of student projects, presentations, and reports by target audience,
clients, or external board of directors
- evaluation
of student portfolios (this is currently in development)
Rubrics
to assist in the evaluation of student performance have been developed
for specific assignments in several FSHN courses. In addition, model
rubrics for various types of assignments have been developed and made
available to faculty. Links to these rubrics can be found in Direct
and Indirect Measures.
The final
measure of student accomplishment is successful placement in appropriate
employment, graduate or professional school, or professional practice
program, as well as continued success in these areas.
Indirect measures
Several
instructors ask students in their courses to reflect on their learning
and accomplishments regularly through required reflections or learning
critiques, and/or in a final self-evaluation.
The FSHN
department routinely employs the following indirect assessment measures:
See Assessment
Program Materials for various forms used, curriculum maps, model
rubrics, survey instruments, etc.
Results
of these measurements
Surveys of seniors and alumni as well as exit interviews with graduating
seniors over the past several years have indicated that students are
happy with their training in FSHN curricula and compare themselves favorably
with others who pursued an equivalent degree in a different institution.
Likewise, discussions with current employers and recruiters have indicated
an overall level of satisfaction with the skills and abilities of FSHN
graduates.
While both
graduating seniors and alumni have expressed overall satisfaction with
their educational experiences in FSHN, both direct observations by faculty
and general comments by potential employers indicated that there is
always room for improvement in students’ communication skills. The FSHN
faculty decided that the various curriculum goals related to communication
would be the first to be addressed in a systematic manner. This began
in 2001.
Through
both self-reflection on their own courses and direct observation of
student performance, faculty also identified critical thinking and problem
solving as departmental goals that deserved attention and increased
emphasis. This began in 2003.
Results
of senior and alumni surveys agreed with the mapping of departmental
goals across the courses in FSHN curricula: more emphasis was needed
on the social implications (including ethical, environmental, multicultural,
and international components) of current issues in food science and
human nutrition. This was discussed at a faculty retreat in 2004.
Department’s
response to these results
An ad-hoc committee of department faculty and staff, named FSHNComm,
has worked to improve both oral and written communication in individual,
small-group, and large-group situations across all curricula in FSHN.
Summary of FSHNComm activities from
2001 until the present.
Specific
activities of FSHNComm that have resulted in changes in FSHN courses
and curricula include:
- identification
of FSHN courses that contain significant communication components,
and identification of the nature of these components
- mapping
of FSHN curricula to verify that an appropriate range of communication
activities is offered to students
- restructuring
of key classes taken by all FSHN students at different stages (FSHN
110 – entry level; FSHN 203 – sophomore level; FSHN 480 – senior seminar)
to provide the appropriate level of instruction and practice in communication
in each course and to ensure that these courses build upon, rather
than repeat, each other.
In 2003-2004
the FSHN Curriculum and Outcomes Assessment Committees have begun to
focus on critical thinking as an essential component of problem
solving, requiring students to critically evaluate information, distinguish
verifiable facts from value claims, detect bias, and identify sources
of conflicts. An important first step was to get faculty to think and
talk about what critical thinking is, how it might be practiced, and
how it is incorporated into course activities. While solving problems
as a team and/or as an individual was identified by instructors as a
major focus in many FSHN courses, three courses were identified by the
Outcomes Assessment Committee as key courses that focus on critical
thinking: FS HN 261 (taken by Dietetics and Nutritional Science majors),
FS HN 403 (taken by Dietetics and Food Science major), and FS HN 480
(taken by all majors in FSHN). Plans are under development to introduce
elements of critical thinking into lower level FSHN courses that all
students take (FSHN 110 and 203).
The FSHN
faculty voted to include FSHN 342 World Food Issues as a required course
in all FSHN curricula in the 2005-2007 catalog. This course addresses
issues of food quality, nutritional value, safety, and availability
from various perspectives, and provides students with the opportunity
to explore ethical, environmental, multicultural, and international
issues in food science and human nutrition.
Back